Stock market indexes are designed to tell a simple story. A number goes up, and investors take it as a sign that things are going well. A number goes down, and concern sets in.
The problem is that a single headline figure can hide a great deal of what is actually happening inside the market it represents.
The S&P 500 has remained near record levels through much of the recent period. For casual observers, that looks like a healthy market. For analysts who track the internal mechanics of how rallies are built and sustained, a different picture has been emerging for weeks.
The gap between what the index shows and what its components are doing has rarely been this wide. And the data behind that divergence is now difficult to dismiss.
Also read: Wells Fargo’s new S&P 500 call signals trouble ahead
Why market breadth matters more than the index level
Market breadth measures how many stocks are participating in a rally or a decline. A healthy advance typically involves broad participation, with companies across multiple sectors moving higher together.
When an index keeps climbing while fewer of its members join in, the advance becomes increasingly dependent on a small group of stocks carrying the weight for everyone else.
Only 25% of S&P 500 stocks were trading above their 50-day moving average as of the most recent reading, the lowest proportion since April and sharply below the 70% recorded in mid-August, according to The Kobeissi Letter. Just 47% of index components were above their 200-day moving average, also the weakest reading since April.
The Kobeissi Letter described the pattern as “rapidly deteriorating” breadth, while noting it is not an automatic sell signal.
Those two figures matter because moving averages serve as a basic test of trend health. A stock trading above its 50-day average is generally holding its recent momentum. One trading below it is losing ground.
When three out of four S&P 500 members are failing that test, the index level alone is telling an incomplete story.
How a handful of stocks are holding up the index
The S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization. The largest companies have the greatest influence on where the index moves. That structure can allow a small group of mega-cap stocks to keep the headline number elevated even as a majority of its other members decline.
Investors rotated back toward several Magnificent Seven stocks, Morningstar reported, including Nvidia and Meta, during the third quarter. At the same time, they moved away from multinational companies facing pressure from higher interest rates and rising commodity costs.
The result is a market that looks resilient at the index level while showing meaningful deterioration across a wide range of individual names.
If the leading technology companies continue advancing, the index may hold its ground. A reversal in those stocks, however, would expose the weakness that has been building underneath.
The S&P 500 has remained near record levels through much of the recent period.Bloomberg / Getty Images
New lows are outpacing new highs by a wide margin
The ratio of stocks reaching new 52-week highs versus new 52-week lows provides another measure of market participation. The current reading on that indicator is not encouraging.
New 52-week lows on the New York Stock Exchange exceeded new highs for 10 consecutive trading sessions. The imbalance occurred in 14 of the previous 15 sessions.
That kind of persistent skew is notable. It suggests that weakness is spreading beyond a handful of individual names and affecting a broad cross-section of the market.
More Wall Street:
Wall Street’s AI trade faces its biggest valuation test
The next Wall Street shift is already underway
Wall Street sends strong 4-word verdict on the stock market
Stocks reaching new lows at this pace, while the index remains near record territory, is an unusual combination that analysts typically flag as a warning.
Breadth can deteriorate for extended periods while an index continues to rise. It does not point to a specific date or price level at which the market will turn.
What it does signal is that the rally has become concentrated in a way that makes it more dependent on a smaller group of stocks continuing to perform.
Why Micron’s earnings offer a reason for optimism
Not every data point is pointing in the same direction. Corporate earnings remain solid, and a stronger-than-expected report from memory-chip manufacturer Micron provided evidence that at least some companies outside the largest technology names are still delivering results.
Strong earnings can support stock prices by demonstrating that companies continue to grow profits despite higher rates and elevated input costs.
The question investors are weighing is whether earnings growth can broaden beyond the largest technology companies.
If profits improve across more sectors, market breadth could recover and the rally could develop a wider base of support. If earnings remain concentrated in a handful of names, the index may continue to depend heavily on those companies to sustain its level.
That distinction will become clearer as the third-quarter earnings season progresses over the next several weeks.
What investor sentiment says about the risk of a major top
Strategist Jay Kaeppel of SentimentTrader offered a counterpoint to the breadth concerns.
Major market tops rarely form before a majority of investors have embraced extreme optimism, he said. By that measure, the current environment does not yet resemble the kind of speculative excess that typically accompanies a final peak. The “euphoria train” has not attracted enough passengers to suggest the market is at a generational turning point.
That reading does not eliminate near-term risks. Weak breadth, higher interest rates, elevated valuations, rising commodity prices and geopolitical uncertainty could still produce a meaningful pullback. Sentiment alone is not a reason to dismiss what the breadth data is showing.
What it does suggest is that the market may not yet be in the late stage of a major cycle. A correction driven by narrowing breadth and concentrated leadership is a different situation from a broad collapse built on euphoric excess.
Investors tracking the difference between those two scenarios will want to watch how the next few weeks of trading and earnings develop.
The indicators that will determine what comes next
The market’s next move is likely to depend on whether breadth stabilizes or continues to weaken.
The percentage of S&P 500 stocks above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages will be closely watched. So will the daily balance between new 52-week highs and lows on the New York Stock Exchange.
Whether gains expand beyond mega-cap technology companies is the central question. Corporate earnings across a wider range of sectors, and the direction of interest rates and inflation expectations, will influence whether that expansion happens. A sustained improvement in participation would strengthen the case for the rally continuing.
Further deterioration would suggest that the index is carrying more concentration risk than the headline number reveals.
The S&P 500’s level is not the problem. The problem is what is happening inside it.
Related: S&P 500’s greatest risk is fast becoming reality